History
  • No items yet
midpage
Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Pokrass
98 N.E.2d 704
NY
1951
Check Treatment

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that section 61 of the General Corporation Law is a bar to toe maintenance of this action. Second question certified answered in the negative. Other questions certified not answered. No opinion.

Concur: Lotjghran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Ftjld and Froessel, JJ. [See 302 N. Y. 840.]

Case Details

Case Name: Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Pokrass
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 12, 1951
Citation: 98 N.E.2d 704
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.