Case Information
*1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
CAPITOL SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
vs.
BIG SKY DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, INC.,
Defendant.
Cause No.: CV 17-54-SPW-TJC
ORDER
Before the Court are United States Magistrate Judge Timothy Cavan's findings and recommendation filed on February 3, 2020. (Doc. 75). Judge Cavan recommends this Court grant Plaintiff Capitol Specialty Insurance's motion for attorney fees (Doc. 52) and award Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation in fees and costs. (Doc. 75 at 19).
I. Standard of review
Big Sky filed timely objections to the findings and recommendation. (Doc. 76). Big Sky is entitled to de novo review of those portions of Judge Cavan's findings and recommendations to which it properly objects. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).
*2
II. Discussion
Big Sky objects to Judge Cavan's recommendation as an unreasonable determination of attorney fees. Big Sky argues that in the underlying lawsuit, the attorneys for Dr. Cole billed half what the attorneys for Big Sky billed. The Court has reviewed the submissions, the briefs, and Judge Cavan's findings and recommendation on the motion for attorney fees, and agrees with Judge Cavan in full. Judge Cavan's recommendation squarely addressed Big Sky's objection: "[T]he Court does not agree with Big Sky that the fees incurred by Dr. Cole in his defense should serve as a measure of what was reasonable and necessary to defend Big Sky. As Mr. Stacey pointed out in his testimony, the claims against Big Sky were much broader than the claim against Dr. Cole . . ." (Doc. 75 at 17).
III. Conclusion and Order
It is hereby ordered:
- Judge Cavan's findings and recommendation are adopted in full;
- Big Sky's objections are overruled;
- Capitol Specialty's motion for attorney fees (Doc. 52, 61) is granted;
- Capitol is awarded in fees and costs.
*3 DATED this day of March, 2020.
SUSAN P. WATTERS U.S. District Court Judge