History
  • No items yet
midpage
Canfield v. Thompson
49 Cal. 210
Cal.
1874
Check Treatment
By the Court McKinstry, J:

The objection to the patent to the city of Santa Barbara was not well taken. The Act of Congress, “to ascertain and settle private land claims,” provides that a patent shall be issued to each “claimant” whose claim shall be finally confirmed.

The bill of exceptions contains all the evidence bearing upon the exceptions taken, and there is contained in it no evidence tending to show that the alleged deed from the town to Gasper Oreña was not in the possession or control of plaintiff. But a certified copy of a deed from the County Recorder’s office is “primary” evidence. (Code Civil Procedure, secs. 1888, 1893, 1894.)

*213The other objections' made to the deed cannot be passed on, because they are not sustained by the transcript. The instrument is not set forth in the bill of exceptions, nor is it referred to so that it is identified.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Rhodes did not express an opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Canfield v. Thompson
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1874
Citation: 49 Cal. 210
Docket Number: No. 4,138
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.