History
  • No items yet
midpage
Caney v. Silverthorne
9 Cal. 67
Cal.
1858
Check Treatment
Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—TERRy, C. J., concurring.

The defendant, having failed to give notice of his intention to move for a new trial, or to file his statement within the time *68limited by the statute, lost his right to move for a new trial. (Practice Act, § 195.)

There is no statement on appeal; the statement for new trial not having been filed in time, is not properly a part of the record. We can only look at the judgment-roll; which, being regular on its face, judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Caney v. Silverthorne
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1858
Citation: 9 Cal. 67
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.