Campos v. State

Jun 17, 1986
84-2634
Reporters:
,
Before:
Nesbitt, Baskin, Daniel S. Pearson (per curiam)

PER ‍‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍CURIAM.

Campos has filed a statement in this appeal contending that the trial court erred in excluding from evidence the discovery deposition of an unavailable witness. We affirm. While ‍‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍the discovery deposition, taken pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(d), may have qualified as a hearsay exception under section 90.804(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1983), it was still inadmissible ‍‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍as substantive evidence absent compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(j). State v. James, 402 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 1981); Barnett v. State, 444 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Terrell v. State, 407 ‍‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). The public defender‘s motion to withdraw is granted.

Affirmed.