No. 74-1373 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Mar 25, 1975

PER CURIAM.

The controlling question on this appeal is:

Whether the trial court erred in imposing upon the defendant separate sentences for rape and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense where both charges arose out of the same transaction.

We think that the question is fully answered in the negative by the holding and the reasoning of the Supreme Court of Florida in Estevez v. State, Fla.1975, 313 So. 2d 692" date_filed="1975-02-26" court="Fla." case_name="Estevez v. State">313 So.2d 692.

Affirmed.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.