History
  • No items yet
midpage
Campbell v. State
647 S.W.2d 660
Tex. Crim. App.
1983
Check Treatment

OPINION ON APPELLANTS’ PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellants were convicted of the offense of aggravated robbery, and punishment was assessed at imprisonment for 30 years. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Campbell v. State, 644 S.W.2d 154 (Tex.App.—Austin, 1982).

We agree with the Court of Appeals that Appellants’ convictions should be affirmed. Accordingly, Appellants’ petitions for discretionary review will be refused. As is true in every case, refusal of discretionary review by this Court does not constitute an endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals.

Appellants’ petitions for discretionary review are refused.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of March, 1983.

Case Details

Case Name: Campbell v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Mar 30, 1983
Citation: 647 S.W.2d 660
Docket Number: 107-83, 108-83
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.