History
  • No items yet
midpage
Campbell v. Read
17 L. Ed. 779
SCOTUS
1865
Check Treatment
69 U.S. 198 (1864)
2 Wall. 198

CAMPBELL
v.
READ.

Supreme Court of United States.

*199 Mr. Eames, for the appellant.

Mr. Stone, contra.

At a subsequent day, the CHIEF JUSTICE announced briefly the court's opinion, that independently of the record's not showing a proper certificate, — this itself being a sufficient ground for dismissal, — the amount in controversy was insignificant, and that the court was satisfied, on an inspection of the papers, that the allocatur was inadvertently *200 sanctioned. There was, he said, no principle involved of such extensive application as to bring the case within the act of Congress giving jurisdiction on a judge's allocatur when the amount in controversy is less than $1000. Notwithstanding the allocatur, therefore, the case was

DISMISSED.

Case Details

Case Name: Campbell v. Read
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 23, 1865
Citation: 17 L. Ed. 779
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.