History
  • No items yet
midpage
Campbell v. Hutcheson
23 Ga. App. 111
Ga. Ct. App.
1918
Check Treatment
Broyles, P. J.

1. Failure to file a claim, under the provisions of the Revised Statutes of the United States, § 3460 (U. S. Comp. St. 1916, § 6362), to property seized by the collector of internal revenue for a violation of the revenue laws will not estop the true owner from asserting his title by an action of trover brought against the purchaser of the property at a sale held by the collector of .internal revenue; provided he has done nothing to mislead the purchaser as to his relation to the property and the title. McLennan v. Graham, 106 Ga. 211 (32 S. E. 118), and cases there cited; Lawless v. Orr, 122 Ga. 276 (50 S. E. 85).

(a) In the instant case the evidence authorized a finding by the. judge of the municipal court of Atlanta, exercising the functions of both judge and jury, that the owner of the property was not present when it was sold by the collector of internal revenue, and that he had done nothing, before or at the sale, to mislead the purchaser as to the owner’s true relation to the property and the title.

2, The constitutional question argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error was not raised in the petition for certiorari, and accordingly the case will not be transferred to the Supreme Court.

3. It does not appear that the judge of the superior, court erred' in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed,.

Bloodworth, J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.

Case Details

Case Name: Campbell v. Hutcheson
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 23, 1918
Citation: 23 Ga. App. 111
Docket Number: 9833
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.