197 Mo. 463 | Mo. | 1906
This cause is here upon appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the New Madrid Circuit Court.
The abstract of record in this cause properly preserves the evidence, instructions given and refused,sufficiently designates the rendition of the decree and judgment, affidavit for an appeal and the order granting the same, and the signing and filing of the bill of exceptions; but there is a fatal omission in the abstract, that is, the petition, answer and reply are nowhere to be found in it. It is true, it appears from the abstract and briefs of counsel on both sides that the original petition and other pleadings have been lost, misplaced, or destroyed, and there is no point made by reason of the absence of them; but this cannot remedy the defects in this abstract. The pleadings constitute the basis of the judgment, and its force and vitality must rest upon such pleadings. The mere fact that counsel concede that the pleadings were in correct form cannot be made the basis of action of this court.
While rule 13 of this court substantially provides that where there is no point made on the pleadings it. will be sufficient for the abstract to embrace the substance of such pleadings, yet this rule by no means contemplates that where the record discloses that there
Legal proceedings affecting the title to real estate should in all things be regular, and we are unwilling to consent to the precedent that parties may agree upon the state of the pleadings and require this court to base its action, either in affirming or reversing the judgment, upon such agreement. The abstract of the record should at least contain the pleadings, which is the foundation upon which the judgment of the trial court, as well as of this court, must be predicated. If the pleadings are lost, misplaced or destroyed, this being a civil proceeding, section 4560, Revised Statutes 1899, furnishes the remedy for supplying them, and the agreement of counsel can by no means take the place of the regular method pointed out for supplying lost records. So far as this case is concerned, it is but little trouble to supply the pleadings; let the statement as provided by section 4560 be filed and from so much of the record as is properly here both parties seem willing that the pleadings be supplied; they can then waive the issuance of process provided by the statute, enter their appearance and consent to judgment supplying the record. From the record as supplied appellant can then make his abstract, in which he can embrace such supplied pleadings. The circuit court of New Madrid county where this case was tried, is the only court having power to supply the lost or destroyed record. Independent of the provsions of the statute, the court has the power to supply lost or destroyed records. The power is inherent in the court to control its own record and supply any losses occuring in that respect. [State v. Simpson, 67 Mo. 647; George v. Middough, 62 Mo. 549; Strain v. Murphy, 49 Mo. 337; Keen v. Jordan, 13 Fla. 327.]