midpage

Campbell v. BrownCampbell v. Brown

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 25, 1897
Appeal, No. 142
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Been
Per Curiam,

The first five specifications allege error in excluding the several offers of ‍​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‍testimony recited therein. The sixth to ninth, inclusive, complain of the findings of fact therein set forth. The tenth to thirteenth, inclusive, allege error in ‍​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‍the several conclusions of law stated therein, and the fourteenth charges error in the decree dismissing the plaintiff’s bill.

We have carefully considered the record, including ‍​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‍the evi*122tience relating to these specifications, and are satisfied that neither of them should be sustained; nor do we think that any of them ‍​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‍requires discussion. Finding no substantial error in either of the trial judge’s rulings on questions of evidence, or in his conclusions of fact and law, ‍​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‍the decree should not be disturbed.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Campbell v. Brown
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 25, 1897
Citations: 38 A. 516; 183 Pa. 112; 1897 Pa. LEXIS 722; Appeal, No. 142
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 142
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
Log In