36 Neb. 792 | Neb. | 1893
This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error to recover upon a quantum, meruit
Section 134 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that allegations of value or of amount of damage shall not be considered as true by failure to controvert them. It therefore became necessary for the plaintiif, notwithstanding the answer contained no denial of his allegations as to the value of the work performed, to prove the reasonable value thereof. And it was error for the court to instruct, the jury that they should assume the amount alleged as the value of the work.
The plaintiif in error contends that the court erred in several other particulars. In view of the conclusion above stated-it is not now necessary to pass upon the other assignments of error; but as the case must be remanded for a new trial, it is proper to say that upon the principal questions in dispute in the case the rulings of the trial court were substantially correct.
Reversed and remanded.