| Mass. | Jun 30, 1970
The plaintiff owns land in Ipswich shown on a recorded subdivision plan approved by the board by a “conditional approval agreement” (December 21, 1956) with the former owners. This agreement, recorded in the registry of deeds on January 14, 1957, purported to limit the duration of the approval to the earliest of the following three dates: (a) the recording of deeds releasing restrictions on all lots in the subdivision; (b) recording a statement that the development of these lots has been permanently discontinued; and (c) the expiration (on December 21, 1963) of seven years from the date of the agreement. The agreement was amended three times in various respects. One amendment, to which the present plaintiff was a party, extended the termination date of the original agreement to December 21, 1966. On August 6, 1968, the board voted “[t]o rescind approval of the subdivision ... on advice of [t]own jkflounsel.” This bill appeals from the board’s rescission action and seeks a declaration that it is void. The board’s plea in bar relies upon the expiration of the amended conditional approval on December 21, 1966, “long prior to” the rescission vote. From a final decree dismissing the bill, after the plea had been sustained, the plaintiff appeals. The board correctly relies on the terms of the amended 1956 agreement. The owner’s acceptance of its terms involved the owner’s acquiescence (cf. Kay-Vee Realty Co. Inc. v. Town Clerk of Ludlow, 355 Mass. 165" court="Mass." date_filed="1969-01-07" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/kay-vee-realty-co-inc-v-town-clerk-of-ludlow-2096507?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="2096507">355 Mass. 165, 168-170) in the board’s failure to approve the subdivision plan unconditionally (even if the conditions imposed' in the agreement could be said not to have been authorized by the subdivision control law then in effect). See G. L. c. 41, §§ 81M (inserted by St. 1953, c. 674, § 7; since amended by St. 1957, c. 265), 81U (as
Interlocutory and final decrees affirmed.