81 Ga. 740 | Ga. | 1888
Tbe complaint bere is tbat tbe court below refused tbe motion of tbe plaintiff in error to set aside tbe judgment rendered against bim in tbis case and to reinstate tbe case. Tbe ground of tbe motion was, tbat tbe parties bad agreed to arbitrate tbe case, and tbat tbe case, when called in court, should be continued, so as to enable tbem to arbitrate; but tbat notwithstanding this, tbe case was called by tbe court and brought to trial, and a verdict rendered against the defendant, who is tbe plaintiff* in error bere. This agreement between tbe parties
When cases are brought into court, they are not 'wholly at the disposal of the parties. The piaintiff, under the statute, may dismiss his case, either in vacation or in- term time; and the parties may settle a case without the intervention of the court; but the proceed-' ings of the court are under the control of the presiding judge, and the case cannot be continued without his permission. In this case, there was no motion to continue the case when called, nor was the attention of the court called to this agreement of the parties, counsel being ignorant of the same. We therefore see no abuse of his power or discretion in trying the case, or in refusing to set aside the judgment and reinstate the case.
Judgment affirmed.