112 Va. 79 | Va. | 1911
delivered the opinion of the court.
The facts of this case are as follows: The Camp Manufacturing Company is engaged in the business of buying standing timber and timber lands, and the manufac
John W. Harrison and wife owned a tract of 891% acres of land on the south side of the Meherrin river, and on the 18th day of May, 1899, they conveyed to the Brunswick Lumber Company, a corporation, all the timber, pine and poplar, ten inches in diameter across the stump and larger at the time of cutting, on this tract; the deed containing the
Harrison and wife executed a second deed to the Bruns
On the 1st day of November, 1902, the Brunswick Lumber Company conveyed to the Camp Manufacturing Company, as its assignee, and successor, all of the timber property and rights granted to it by John W. Harrison and wife in the two deeds just mentioned, and these deeds were all duly recorded in the clerk’s office of Brunswick county.
On the 1st of January, 1903, Harrison and wife conveyed the 891% acres to George C. Dromgoole, who died leaving as his heirs at law Edward Dromgoole, a brother of the full blood, and John W. Harrison and Mary C. Epes, a brother and sister of the half blood; and by subsequent conveyances the title to the whole 891% acres, called the “Westward Farm,” vested in Mary C. Epes.
In the deed of the 1st of January, 1903, from John W. Harrison to George C. Dromgoole, there is a reservation by which all the timber on the land therein conveyed and all rights under the contracts of sale to the Brunswick Lumber Company, “whether of reversion of said timber or payments to be made by said company for any cause, and all other rights whatever,” are reserved to John W. Harrison and wife.
On the 30th of April, 1906, Mary C. Epes and her husband conveyed to W. R. Carpenter and George W. Pearson this tract of 891% acres.
" It appears that a controversy arose between Mrs. Epes and W. R. Carpenter with respect to the extent and value of the timber rights and interests reserved by John W. Harrison in this 891% acres of land, which resulted in a
The Camp Manufacturing Company, in the prosecution of its business, desired to build a railroad from a point on the Southern railway to the north of the Meherrin river across said stream to its holdings of timber to the south of that river at a point opposite the tract of 891*4 acres, and for this purpose it acquired rights of way from the intervening land owners, and its surveyor and agent went upon the 891*4 acres of land for the purpose of surveying and locating its line of railway. Carpenter was present on that occasion and aware of their purpose. It appears that the country to the east of said tract is rugged, and that a railway cannot be constructed through it without great expense; and Carpenter, it appears, suggested to the Camp Manufacturing Company’s agent a line for the railroad through the tract of 891*4 acres and through a tract owned by one Austin Phillips, through whose lands a right of way could be acquired without great expense, and pointed out in detail what was, in his judgment, the proper location for the road. Upon an examination it was found that the line suggested by Carpenter was an advantageous route, and thereupon, on the same day, the 2,5th of September, 1908, the agent of the Camp Manufacturing Company went to Phillips and was told by him that it would also be necessary to acquire a right of way through the lands of his brother, A. D. Phillips, and thereupon the Camp Manu
“Austin Phillips and wife to Camp Manufacturing Company. Agreement.
“We have this day sold to Camp Mfg. Co. a right of way across our lands which was looked over by Mr. Rawlings for the purpose of locating a railroad, for the sum of Seventy One Dollars, one dollar of which has been paid, the balance seventy dollars to be paid when deed is prepared and signed which we agree to do when presented. It is agreed that said company can keep said road on our land as long as needed (the time to be agreed upon when contract is signed) provided they pay us the said amount of $71.00 a year.
“Witness our hands signatures and seals this 25th day of September, 1908.
his
“Austin x Phillips (Seal) mark
his
“A. D. x Phillips (Seal)” mark
This paper was acknowledged before a notary public upon the day of its date, and was admitted to record on the 5th day of October, 1908. On the 80th of September, 1908, Austin Phillips, whose land lies immediately south of the 891% acres, known as the Harrison tract, conveyed to W. R. Carpenter, in consideration of the sum of $12.50, a strip of land fifteen feet wide, extending entirely through and across the farm of 66 acres on which Austin Phillips now resides, the said strip thus conveyed being bounded on the north by the lands of Carpenter and Pearson, which is the Harrison tract so often mentioned, and the lands of Adeline Brown. This deed was acknowledged on the 30th
The Camp Manufacturing Company entered upon a portion of this fifteen-foot strip of land purchased by Carpenter from Phillips, and thereupon Carpenter brought an action of ejectment to recover possession of it. The Camp Manufacturing Company filed its bill to enjoin the prosecution of this action of ejectment and of a certain action of unlawful detainer, and the injunction was granted, upon condition that it confess judgments in favor of Carpenter, the plaintiff in the actions of ejectment and unlawful detainer, which said judgments when confessed were to be held subject to the future order of the court in the chancery cause. Carpenter answered this bill, and depositions were taken, from which we deduce the facts as we have stated them.
The circuit court was of opinion that the plaintiff had “failed to show such a state of facts as to justify a court of equity in interfering by injunction to prevent the defendant, W. R. Carpenter, from the full use and enjoyment of his fee simple title to the fifteen-foot strip of land in the proceedings mentioned, or to prevent him from suing out a writ of possession for the said land upon the judgment in ejectment instituted against it by the said Carpenter, and referred to in the proceedings; or from suing out a similar writ of possession upon the judgment in his favor against the said Camp Manufacturing Company, which was confessed by the said Camp Manufacturing Company in the suit of unlawful detainer instituted against it by said Carpenter.” It therefore directed a writ of possession to issue in favor of Carpenter against the Camp Manufacturing Company in the ejectment suit, and a similar writ in the case of unlawful detainer; and nothing further remaining to be done, the cause was removed from the
We think that the paper writing signed by Austin Phillips and his brother, dated the 25th of September, 1908, is evidence of a valid contract. It was for a lawful purpose, between parties capable of contracting, for a valuable consideration and under seal; and the provision in it, that the Camp Manufacturing Company “can keep said road on our land as long as needed,” does not render the contract incomplete or uncertain. It was duly recorded within ten days from its date, and by virtue of section 2467 of the Code, “is as valid as to creditors and subsequent purchasers as if such admission to record had been on the day of such acknowledgment and certificate.” Such being the effect of the statute law, W. R. Carpenter, when he acquired his deed from Phillips of the 30th of September, 1908, took his title with constructive notice of the rights of the Camp Manufacturing Company.
Without going into a detailed discussion of the facts which have been fully stated, we are of opinion that if the contract of September 25, 1908, had not been recorded Carpenter is shown by the evidence to have had actual notice of the rights of appellant under that contract, and was by his conduct so connected with and related to the subject as to justify a court of equity in restraining him from any interference with the Camp Manufacturing Company in the construction and operation of a railway across the fifteen-foot strip of land in the bill and proceedings mentioned.
The decree of the circuit court must, therefore, be reversed, and this court will enter a decree restoring and perpetuating the injunction, so as to permit the appellant to enter upon, occupy and enjoy the use of so much of the aforesaid strip of land as may be convenient and necessary for its purposes in the construction and operation of
Reversed.