midpage

Camerron v. StateCamerron v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Jun 23, 1987
No. 86-2388
Versions:508 So. 2d 570
12 Fla. L. Weekly 1537
1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9006
PER CURIAM.

The state concedes error in the trial court’s inclusion of victim injury points in scoring the robbery conviction when physical contact does not constitute an element of the crime. Vaillant v. State, 490 So.2d 1326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.7. See also Byrd v. State, 503 So.2d 434 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (victim injury may not be scored because not element of robbery); Vega v. State, 498 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986) (same); Ritts v. State, 491 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (same); Wright v. State, 487 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (victim injury not a necessary element of armed robbery). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit. Phillips v. State, 476 So.2d 194 (Fla.1985).

Conviction affirmed, sentence vacated, and remanded for resentencing.

Case Details

Case Name: Camerron v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jun 23, 1987
Citations: 508 So. 2d 570; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1537; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9006; No. 86-2388
Docket Number: No. 86-2388
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In