History
  • No items yet
midpage
Camden Mortgage Guaranty & Title Co. v. Haines
110 N.J. Eq. 461
N.J.
1932
Check Treatment

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Leaming, which rests upon the reasoning of the case of Camden Mortgage Guaranty and Title Co. v. Borton, above set out.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None. *Page 466

Case Details

Case Name: Camden Mortgage Guaranty & Title Co. v. Haines
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 16, 1932
Citation: 110 N.J. Eq. 461
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.