Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc. v. JohnsonCambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc. v. Johnson
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the motion is denied.
Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of Brian J. Johnson (defendant) to compel plaintiff to comply with the release agreement between plaintiff and defendants. Defendant brought his motion after the related third-party action was settled and an unconditional stipulation of discontinuation as to him with respect to this action was signed by the attorneys for plaintiff and defendant and filed. Although a trial court has the power “to exercise supervisory control over all phases of pending actions and proceedings” (Teitelbaum Holdings v Gold, 48 NY2d 51, 54 [1979]), it lacks jurisdiction to entertain a motion after the action has been “unequivocally terminated . . . [by the execution of] an express, unconditional stipulation of discontinuance” (id. at 56; see Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v Royal Ins. Co., 247 NY 435, 444 [1928]; DiBella v Martz, 58 AD3d 935, 937 [2009]; Germanovich v Bethlehem Steel Corp. [appeal No. 1], 270 AD2d 863, 863 [2000]).
Present—Smith, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.