Calloway v. State

Jun 13, 1917
8772
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
George
George, J.

1. The court did not err in admitting the evidence of the ‍‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‍witness Collins, set out in ground 4 of the amendment to the motion for new trial, over the objections urged thereto. Certain portions of the evidence ‍‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‍may have been objectionable, but the objection was made to it as a whole, and some of it was both relevant and material.

2. The court ‍‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‍did not err in overruling the objections to, and in admitting, the testimony of the witness Sauls complained of in the 5th ground of ’ ‍‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‍the amendment to the motion for new trial.

3. The- evidence was sufficient to warrant the conviction of the accused, and the court did not err in ‍‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‍overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Luke, J.‘ concur.