History
  • No items yet
midpage
Calloway, E. v. Rudenstein, D.
169 A.3d 558
| Pa. | 2017
|
Check Treatment

*1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT EDMOND CALLOWAY, : No. 49 EM 2017

: Petitioner :

: : v. :

: : DAVID RUDENSTEIN, :

: Respondent :

ORDER PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of May, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are DISMISSED . See Commonwealth v. Ali , 10 A.3d 282, 293 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Case Details

Case Name: Calloway, E. v. Rudenstein, D.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 31, 2017
Citation: 169 A.3d 558
Docket Number: Calloway, E. v. Rudenstein, D. - No. 49 EM 2017
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.