History
  • No items yet
midpage
California Credit Collection Corporation v. Mooney
199 Cal. 780
| Cal. | 1926
|
Check Treatment

MEMORANDUM CASES.
THE COURT.

Upon examination of the record in this case we are satisfied that the trial court was in error as to each of the two main questions presented upon this appeal. We are further satisfied that a practically parallel situation is presented upon this appeal as that presented and considered by the district court of appeal in and for the third appellate district in the cases ofCalifornia Credit Collection Corp. v. Randall (Cal.App.),244 P. 958, California Credit Collection Corp. v. Goodin (Cal.App.), 246 P. 121, and California Credit CollectionCorp. v. Carpenter (Cal.App.), 246 P. 126.

In the latter two of the above cases a petition for hearing in this court was denied. Upon the authority of these cases the judgment herein is reversed. *Page 781

Case Details

Case Name: California Credit Collection Corporation v. Mooney
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 23, 1926
Citation: 199 Cal. 780
Docket Number: Docket No. S.F. 11927.
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.