History
  • No items yet
midpage
Calhoun v. Eysenbach
124 P. 978
Okla.
1912
Check Treatment

The only question involved in this case is whether an ordinance of the city of Tulsa requiring real estate brokers to pay a license tax, and providing that it shall be a misdemeanor to engage in the business without the payment of the tax, prevents a broker, who has not paid the license from recovering on a contract under which he has earned his commission. The issue is determined against the defendant by the case ofHughes v. Snell, 28 Okla. 828, 115 P. 1105, 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1133, and it is unnecessary to examine the numerous authorities cited in the able brief of the plaintiff in error, as that case determines the issue in favor of the plaintiff.

We think the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Case Details

Case Name: Calhoun v. Eysenbach
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Jun 25, 1912
Citation: 124 P. 978
Docket Number: 1887
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.