History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals Board
61 N.Y.2d 976
NY
1984
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Sullivan (94 AD2d 229). We also note that the Board found that the actual occupants of the apartment under the lease were Robert J. Castle and his wife and that the apartment was not their primary residence. That being so, Michael Castle, their son, had no right to renewal of the lease based upon section 235-f of the Real Property Law (L 1983, ch 403).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals Board
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 22, 1984
Citation: 61 N.Y.2d 976
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.