History
  • No items yet
midpage
Caldwell v. Hahn
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 682
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1929
|
Check Treatment

[1] This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment awarding plaintiffs the recovery of one thousand dollars paid by them as commissions to the appellants for representing respondents as purchasers of that property designated as lot 8 in the opinion filed this day in the case of Robson v. Hahn,ante, p. 671 [277 P. 507]. The facts and the law are set forth in that opinion and we deem further discussion unnecessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Works, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on June 4, 1929, and a petition by appellants to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on July 3, 1929.

All the Justices present concurred.

*Page 1

Case Details

Case Name: Caldwell v. Hahn
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: May 6, 1929
Citation: 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 682
Docket Number: Docket No. 5184.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.