History
  • No items yet
midpage
Caldwell & Drake v. Pierce
154 Ky. 771
Ky. Ct. App.
1913
Check Treatment

Response to Petition for Rehearing by

Chief Justice Hobson

Reversing.

Upon a reconsideration of this case, we conclude that appellee should he allowed interest on the balance found due her from the filing of her petition. The judgment determines that this amount was then due her, and should have been paid. The general rule is that interest is allowed on the balance due on an account from the bringing of the suit. (Tobin v. South, 18 R., 350; Henderson Cotton Mfg. Co. v. Lowell Machine Shops, 86 Ky., 668.)

The opinion is extended to this extent; the judgment appealed from is reversed on the cross appeal; and the cause remanded for a judgment as above indicated. In other respects the petition for rehearing is overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Caldwell & Drake v. Pierce
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Date Published: Sep 23, 1913
Citation: 154 Ky. 771
Court Abbreviation: Ky. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.