History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
350 U.S. 898
SCOTUS
1955
Check Treatment

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed.*

Mr. Justice Reed believes certiorari should have been denied and dissents from the judgment of reversal. Mr. Justice *899Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that the petition for writ of certiorari should have been denied. Randolph J. Seifert and William A. Blank for petitioner. Robert M. Peet for respondent.

Notes

Amended May 14, 1956. 351 U. S. 183.

Case Details

Case Name: Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Nov 21, 1955
Citation: 350 U.S. 898
Docket Number: No. 436
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In