No. 622 | SCOTUS | Jan 29, 1940
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Euclid v. Ambler, 272 U.S. 365" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1926-11-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/village-of-euclid-v-ambler-realty-co-100934?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="100934">272 U. S. 365; Cusack Co. v. Chicago, 242 U.S. 526" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1917-01-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/thomas-cusack-co-v-city-of-chicago-98856?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="98856">242 U. S. 526; (2) Hatch v. Reardon, 204 U.S. 152" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1907-01-07" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/new-york-ex-rel-hatch-v-reardon-96569?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="96569">204 U. S. 152, 160-161; Standard Food Co. v. Wright, 225 U.S. 540" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1912-06-10" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/standard-stock-food-co-v-wright-97676?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="97676">225 U. S. 540, 550; Warehouse Co. v. Tobacco Growers, 276