Cadle Co. v. Court Living Corp.Cadle Co. v. Court Living Corp.
It is undisputed that appellant Greco has appeared for deposition and provided the information sought from her as well as regarding her co-appellant, rendering the appeal moot (see Matter of McMahon v Landon, 154 AD2d 745 [1989]). Appellants have failed adequately to explain how the circumstances fall within an exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]).
Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Gonzalez, Catterson and Malone, JJ.