Cadgene v. Cadgene

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court, with this added observation — that Judge Barbour, in support of his conclusions in the instant case, quoted from the opinion of the New York Supreme Court (Erie county) in Boehringer v. Schmid, 133 N.Y. Misc. Rep. 236; 232 N.Y. Supp. 360. It may be worthy to note that the judgment of the New York Supreme Court in that case was unanimously affirmed by the Court of Appeals of New York in a per curiam opinion reported in 254 N.Y. 355; 173 N.E.Rep. 220.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Cadgene v. Cadgene

Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date Published: Apr 25, 1940

Citation: 124 N.J.L. 566

Court Abbreviation: N.J.