No. 85-441 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Nov 13, 1985

PER CURIAM.

■ Appellant’s probation was revoked in open court based upon his conviction of uttering a forgery and grand theft. The written judgment also included as a ground for revocation resisting arrest. We modify the judgment by eliminating the finding of resisting arrest and, as modified, affirm the revocation of probation.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.