Cadell v. Director of Revenue, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 7

Cadell v. Director of Revenue

1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 7

| Mo. Ct. App. | 1999

Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals the trial court’s judgment sustaining the Director of Revenue’s order suspending his driving privileges. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

*208An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).