History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cade v. Brownlee
15 Ind. 369
Ind.
1860
Check Treatment
Peekins, J.

Gade purchased a lease, for a term of years, upon a tin-shop, and took an assignment thereof. Subsequently he sold and assigned the lease to one Pileher. At *370the time Carle assigned the lease to Pilcher, he had not made full payment of the price of it to his assignor, and Pilcher knew the fact. There was no fraud in the sale of the lease.

A. Steele and H. D. Thompson, for appellants. J. F. McDowell, I Van Devanier and J. Brownlee, for appellee.

This is a suit to enforce a vendor’s lien upon the lease in Pilcher's possession, (as is also the leased property,) for the purchase money unpaid by Oade.

Such a suit will not lie. The vendor of personal property has no general lien for unpaid purchase money, upon such property, after he has parted with the possession. Williams on Personal Property, 2d Am. ed., side p. 40. A lease for a term of years is personal property. Williams on Personal Property, by Rawle, side p. 8 et seg. Such lien upon real estate does not meet with universal favor. Washburn on Real Prop. 504; see Work v. Brayton, 5 Ind. 396.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded for dismissal.

Case Details

Case Name: Cade v. Brownlee
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 14, 1860
Citation: 15 Ind. 369
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.