C. Edward Myers Co. v. Town of Boonton, 100 N.J.L. 406

C. Edward Myers Co. v. Town of Boonton

100 N.J.L. 406

N.J.

1924

Check Treatment

Neither after consideration of the facts, nor of the law involved in this case, are we disposed to disturb the judgment appealed from; for, as was sagely remarked by Lord Coke, "ubieadem ratio ibi idem jus." Co. Litt. 10a; Ippollito v.Ridgefield, 94 N.J.L. 97; Headley v. Cavelier,82 N.J.L. 637; Jersey City Supply Co. v. Jersey City, 71 Id.631; Ocean City v. Shriver, 64 Id. 550.

The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None. *Page 407