History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bystrom v. Rohlen
134 Minn. 67
Minn.
1916
Check Treatment
Taylor, C.

This is an appeal from an order made by the district court of Swift county apportioning between the parties hereto the reward given by *68statute for the arrest and conviction of a horse thief. Appellants contend that respondent is barred from participating in,thc reward by the fact that he was a constable and the night marshal of the village of Milan. Neither the theft nor the arrest took place within that village, and the arrest was made without a warrant. While a village constable as a peace officer may, under certain circumstances, make an arrest outside his village and without a warrant for an offense committed outside the village, the law does not command him to do so, and if he aids in making such an arrest he may participate in a reward offered for the arrest and conviction of the offender. Burkee v. Matson, 114 Minn. 233, 130 N. W. 1025, 34 L.R.A. (N.S.) 924.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bystrom v. Rohlen
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jul 14, 1916
Citation: 134 Minn. 67
Docket Number: Nos. 19,828—(189)
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.