midpage

Byrnes v. Chase National BankByrnes v. Chase National Bank

New York Court of Appeals
Jun 13, 1929
Versions:251 N.Y. 551
168 N.E. 423
1929 N.Y. LEXIS 804
*552 Per Curiam.

No appeal having been taken to the Appellate Division from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the complaint as to the defendants Conant and Elliman, the question of the liability of said defendants is not before this court, and they have been erroneously designated as respondents on this appeal.

The judgment of the Appellate Division dismissing the complaint as to the defendants other than Conant and Elliman, should be affirmed with costs.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur; Hubbs, J., not sitting.

Judgment accordingly.

Case Details

Case Name: Byrnes v. Chase National Bank
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 13, 1929
Citations: 251 N.Y. 551; 168 N.E. 423; 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 804
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In