History
  • No items yet
midpage
Byrne v. Holt
2 Wash. C. C. 282
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1808
Check Treatment

BY THE COURT. If this had been a case of a plea to the jurisdiction, the evidence would have been sufficient to prove the allegation in the plea, that Holt was a citizen of Pennsylvania at the time the judgment was rendered. It is proved, that in July, 1800, he was living with his family, and keeping house on rented land in this state, and carrying on business as a merchant. In September, the bond states that he had been a resident of the state of Delaware, and of course that he was not then so. This is so strongly corroborative of the fact proved by the deposition, that we must consider that he continued an inhabitant and citizen of this state in December following, unless the contrary had been proved. Rule made absolute.

Case Details

Case Name: Byrne v. Holt
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 15, 1808
Citation: 2 Wash. C. C. 282
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.