Byrd v. State
70 Fla. 264 | Fla. | 1915
The only question presented is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction of knowingly receiving stolen property. There can be no question that the accused got the property from the
We find no substantial variance between the allegation and the proof, and the judgment is affirmed.
Taylor, C. J., and Shackleford, Cockrell, Whitfield and Ellis, JJ., concur.