History
  • No items yet
midpage
Byrd v. Hampton
243 N.C. 627
| N.C. | 1956
|
Check Treatment
91 S.E.2d 671 (1956)
243 N.C. 627

Watson E. BYRD and Pauline G. Byrd, trading as Town'n County Cleaners
v.
James Dewey HAMPTON and Federal Insurance Company.

No. 90.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 29, 1956.

*672 Cogburn & Cogburn, Canton, for plaintiff-appellees.

Williams & Williams, Asheville, for defendant Hampton.

Meekins, Packer & Roberts, Asheville, for defendant Federal Insurance Company.

PER CURIAM.

There were, as stated, a number of interlocutory rulings made during the progress of the trial. However, no final judgment was entered from which an appeal could be prosecuted, and the court, in the exercise of its discretion, set the verdict aside. Roberts v. Hill, 240 N.C. 373, 82 S.E.2d 373. Hence the record as it now appears before us contains no final judgment from which appeal will lie. In view of this condition of the record, it is necessary to vacate, without prejudice, all interlocutory rulings made during the progress of the trial, and to remand the cause for a trial de novo as to all parties and as to all questions raised by the pleadings. It is so ordered.

Venire de novo.

Case Details

Case Name: Byrd v. Hampton
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Feb 29, 1956
Citation: 243 N.C. 627
Docket Number: 90
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.