Buynofsky v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
183 A.D. 901 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1918
No opinion. Mills, Rich and Kelly, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., and Blaekmar, J., dissented for the reason that they are of opinion that the defendant did not admit in its pleadings that it was engaged exclusively in interstate commerce, or that the plaintiff ■ at the time of the accident was so engaged.