History
  • No items yet
midpage
Butterworth v. Stagg
2 Johns. Cas. 291
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1801
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This is evidently an abuse of the process of the court. It is a contempt to bring a fictitious suit, or to use the name of another, without his privity or consent. If we do not interfere, the nominal plaintiff may be materially injured ; and when it is in our power to afford him relief, in this summary mode, as for a contempt, we ought to do it, and reach the real person who has perverted the process of the court. We therefore grant the rule. (Coxe v. Phillips, Cas. temp. Hardw. 237. 4 Bl. Com. 285.)

Rule granted. (a)

(a) See 2 Revised Statutes of New York, 534, § 1. Graham’s Practice, 2d ed. 691.

Case Details

Case Name: Butterworth v. Stagg
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 15, 1801
Citation: 2 Johns. Cas. 291
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.