History
  • No items yet
midpage
Butler v. State
348 So. 2d 627
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1977
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The defendant was granted a delayed appeal pursuant to Baggett v. Wainwright, 229 So.2d 239 (Fla.1969). On the appeal, the single point presented urges reversal upon the ground that the original object from which his latent fingerprint was lifted was not produced in court. While no case supporting this proposition has been cited, it should be noted that the evidence showed that the object was not available to the State at the time of trial. No error has been shown. Cf. United States v. Sewar, 468 F.2d 236 (9th Cir. 1972); United States v. Herndon, 536 F.2d 1027 (5th Cir. 1976); *628and Smith v. State, 305 So.2d 868 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Butler v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 19, 1977
Citation: 348 So. 2d 627
Docket Number: No. 76-1037
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.