Butler v. SelskyButler v. Selsky
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who performed the cell search and authored the report, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Davis v Goord, 34 AD3d 1027, 1027 [2006]). Petitioner’s exculpatory statements,
Cardona, P.J., Carpinello, Rose, Lahtinen and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.