History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bushnell v. Lininger
235 Or. 59
Or.
1963
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for the taking of gravel by defendant from land alleged to be owned by plaintiffs. Defendant, Douglas county, answered claiming title to the land in question and affirmatively prayed that its title be quieted. The ease was tried on the issue of title. The trial court found for plaintiffs. Defendant appeals from the decree entered.

This case presents purely factual issues. The facts are of interest only to the parties. There was more than one basis for reaching the decision made by the trial court. At the conclusion of the trial the trial judge fully explained the reasons for his findings. We concur with the reasons stated and the findings made.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bushnell v. Lininger
Court Name: Oregon Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 15, 1963
Citation: 235 Or. 59
Court Abbreviation: Or.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.