midpage

Bushman v. CommonwealthBushman v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Feb 26, 1885
Reporters:
,
Before:
Allen
C. Allen, J.

If the various counts in the indictment were ‍‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‍intended to charge but a single transaction, namely, the larceny at the same time of the property of several different ‍‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‍persons, only one count was necessary. Commonwealth v. O’Brien, 107 Mass. 208. It does not appear on the record in the present case ‍‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‍whether the larcenies were or were not distinct. We are not bound to assume that they were one and ‍‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‍the same offence, though alleged to have been committed on the same day. No error appears on the record. Carlton v. Commonwealth, 5 Met. ‍‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‍532. Crowley v. Commonwealth, 11 Met. 575. Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth, 135 Mass. 266. Pettes v. Commonwealth, 126 Mass. 242. Commonwealth v. Hills, 10 Cush. 530.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bushman v. Commonwealth
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Feb 26, 1885
Citations: 138 Mass. 507; 1885 Mass. LEXIS 240
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
Log In