49 Barb. 599 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1867
The plaintiff was very properly nonsuited upon the trial. His contract, which was in writing, when he came to introduce it in evidence, was wholly different from the one set forth in the complaint, and only entitled him to one half the quantity of barrel heads
The cause of action which the facts, as stated, constituted was very plain; and was not sustained by the evidence. The nonsuit was therefore proper, and a new trial should be denied.
J. C. Smith, Welles and Johnson, Justices.]