12 N.Y.S. 85 | Superior Court of Buffalo | 1890
This action was tried with the cause of Beigleman against This Defendant, ante, 83, is for like relief, and dependent upon substantially the same facts, the difference being that plaintiffs are'owners and in
In the Deigleman Case it is not apparent from the proof that any damage is suffered on account of the stagnant water, and the claim.is made by defendant that no damage can accrue to this plaintiff for the reason that there is no occupant of the adjoining property. This is meant, doubtless, in the sense that plaintiffs have no house or building upon the premises which is occupied, by themselves or another.
In Ruckman v. Green, 9 Hun, 225, the supreme court considered this question and condemned the claim of defendant as unsound, holding that the land being vacant made the measurement of damage more difficult, but did not impair the right to recover. It follows that plaintiffs in this action are entitled to relief and judgment directing defendant to cause the removal of the water either by filling the pit or drawing it off, and prohibiting defendant from retaining in its pits stagnant water.