231 S.W. 441 | Tex. App. | 1921
Appellants' brief contains no assignments of error, and therefore the judgment must be affirmed, unless the record discloses fundamental error. The brief referred to copies certain of the trial court's findings of fact, and designates them assignments of error, the following being a sample:
It will be noted that the alleged assignments do not charge that the trial court committed any error; nor does the brief follow them up with any proposition, as required by the rules. It is true that it contains what is called propositions, but these are mere recitals of certain testimony contained in the statement of facts, and do not assert any proposition of law.
We do not sustain appellees' contention that the alleged assignments should not be considered because they were not filed in the court below and copied from the transcript, because, as the findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed after the final judgment was rendered, under rule 101 (142 S.W. xxiv) appellants had the right to complain of such findings and conclusions by assignments of error presented in their brief, though not contained in the transcript. Moody v. Bonham, 178 S.W. 1020; Craver v. Greer,
We have discovered no fundamental error, and therefore the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed. *442