midpage

Burton v. 215 East 77th AssociatesBurton v. 215 East 77th Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 5, 2001
Versions:284 A.D.2d 122
725 N.Y.S.2d 337
2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5706

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered December 19, 1996, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendant Lenox Hill Hospital’s motion to dismiss the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS court properly concluded that plaintiff lacked legal capacity to sue defendant hospital by virtue of his failure to schedule the tort claim against it, which arose prior to the close of his personal bankruptcy proceeding, within the bankruptcy proceeding (see, Dynamics Corp. v Marine Midland Bank-New York, 69 NY2d 191; DeLarco v DeWitt, 136 AD2d 406). While plaintiff maintains that his trustee was aware of the tort claim, actual knowledge by a trustee of a claim is not a substitute for proper scheduling (see, Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Sec. Corp. v Mathiasen, 207 AD2d 280, 282). Nor did the proper scheduling of the plaintiff’s contract claim against defendant 215 East 77th Associates suffice to meet the bankruptcy scheduling requirements with respect to plaintiff’s tort claim against Lenox Hill (see, id.). We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli and Friedman, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Burton v. 215 East 77th Associates
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 5, 2001
Citations: 284 A.D.2d 122; 725 N.Y.S.2d 337; 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5706
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In