Burtis v. Haines
92 N.J.L. 248
N.J.
1918
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard. Bergen, Minturn, Black, Wi-iite, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.