Burtis v. Haines
92 N.J.L. 248 | N.J. | 1918
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard. Bergen, Minturn, Black, Wi-iite, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.