Burtis v. Haines

92 N.J.L. 248 | N.J. | 1918

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard. Bergen, Minturn, Black, Wi-iite, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.