History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burt v. Kurtz
5 Rawle 246
Pa.
1835
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

A claim to perpetuate the lien of a mechanic or material man, if within time in other respects, may undoubtedly be well filed after a judicial sale of the premises. Where the purchase money is substituted for the land, there is no reason why the lien should not attach itself to it, as it would to the land in the hands of the purchaser, were it liable to the charge. The liens in question, therefore, were properly allowed.

Decree affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Burt v. Kurtz
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 16, 1835
Citation: 5 Rawle 246
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.